Welp. We haven't done this in a while. It isnt because I haven't been meaning too, moreso waiting for a good time when I had a bunch more info to put in the box.

With the Ottawa Citizen now posting about CDC (ill get there) what better time to update our CDC Infobox than now? It's been a few months, and the project how has some clearer timelines, some changes in restrictions, and more set requirements than before.

So, what better time than now! Anywho. Heres a rundown of the major changes:

• The 12-20 potential hulls has been added, fixing my guesstimate of 8-12 a few months ago.

• The 105m limit is no longer a hard limit, nice one, but not strict. I don't think we have a high chance of going past 120m though.

• Added the 7000+ nautical mile range and and 30 days endurance from Vice-Admiral Topshee. We kinds knew that, basic math, but hid confirmation is what we needed to add it.

• As we first reported a few weeks ago, 2039 IOC date, 2049 FOC date, and an RFI released this year, likely summer. These dates are subject to change, and there is a push to get them a lot sooner if possible.

• Finally cemented the VLS, which seems very likely now. Torpedoes not added as they have not been confirmed.

• Updated to clarify that the flight deck has not been decided on.

• Added Polar 6 equivalent instead of Polar Class 6 as there has been further clarification that the navy might not go for the full IACS certification requirements.

• Weight raised to 2500-4000 as a general area of thought. No tonnage confirmed, if there is one desired.

This represents my most up to date understanding of the Continental Defence Corvette, and likely close to the final package that the navy brass is seeking to get out of the project. As always, unfunded, not approved, could change when presented. All that fun drag.

Use this infobox as a handy tool, or a quick share resource. If you guys like this, maybe I'll do similar for FASST-V and Arctic Mobile Base? I like these little graphics. They give a quick, easily-digestable resource that almost everyone knows and can read easily without being overwhleming or confusion.

Straight to the point, all the basic info you need in a little package. I like that kind of stuff. It's fun to have CDC in the general conversation, though if I can be that guy for a minute… usually I dont like to call out things, nor try to step above and clarify on my elder reporters. However, I do also believe on axcurste informations.

The Ottawa Citizen article is fine, however there are a few things I think need addressed. Firstly, the price tag. I don't know where they're getting five billion from, but nowhere in any CDC media or in any talks ive had have I ever even heard a solid guess on the price tag.

It quite literally does not exist as I know. There is zero way that 12 corvettes, let alone up to 20 comes in at five billion. That us enough for the VLS modules and initial munitions, but for the whole vessels? With all the radars, sonars, systems, munitions, equipment, etc put in? Zero way this costs five billion.

You could get them built at the cheapest shipyard in China, and fitted with North Korean technology, and I still doubt that price tag would be under five billion. That is an insane number to put out there, especially one that everyone knows is ridiculously low.

Maybe they heard over five billion and got confused? Or misremembered? Thats the only legitimate way I can see that number thrown out there. No other way makes sense. I swear though, I better not see complaining about ‘price increases’ based off a ridiculous five billion dollar number. I will dropkick someone.

Seondly is the RFI question, which I found weird. No one is gonna tell you when the RFI is dropping, usually because those dates fluxtuate so much, for so many reasons that it's almost worthless information. It's so worthless that I dont even bother reporting rumors on them.

In some cases they may not even know themsleves! They may have a rough idea, liek in the summer, but beyond that? Absolutely no way you're getting a date. RFI releases can be delayed by just about anything. Could be issues with funding, caught in review, lack of procurement staff, political delay, ATIP requests, waiting on thr French copy. Lots of things can delay it.

Now, I don't know what they asked. Maybe they just asked a general ‘Summer-Fall-Winter’ timeline. That can be a bit more reasonable, and usually if one asks the DND will mention it, at least for me. Maybe not them.

Anything beyond that is silly to ask for. It just isnt worth it. You'll never get a good amswer because it just doesn't exist. You're better off asking a Shaman to foretell the date, like me, because that's about as accurate as you can get.

Those are my two mentions from the article. Rest is generally accurate, including timelines. I should note the 2039 timeline is very much in the fsr end of the spectrum. Navy would definetly liek it sooner if possible, and there have been talks of rushing through CDC to get a contract awarded.

RFP would come around 2027/2028, award hopefully before 2030 would be great. That alone likely means an IOC date before 2039. I always stress that timelines like this aint set in stone. They change, especially this early in the project lifecycle. You shouldn't be too held up by it yet.

Thats about all I have to rant about! Howpfully yall can find some value in this little box.

April 24, 2026 – Kingston, ON – National Defence / Canadian Armed Forces

Leaders from the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) and Royal Roads University (RRU) signed an agreement on April 24, 2026, marking a significant milestone in the launch of a new subsidized education pathway for approximately 40 CAF members at RRU in Fall 2026.

This pathway offers a cohort-based, in-residence experience designed to prepare participants for a successful career in the CAF. As a new stream within the Regular Officer Training Plan (ROTP), the pathway complements existing CAF programs and supports expanded officer development capacity.

In addition to completing an undergraduate degree, this pathway will incorporate elements of leadership and ethics, fitness, health and wellbeing, and second official language training throughout the academic year.

A joint CAF–RRU committee will oversee the planning, delivery, and evaluation of the program. The pathway is expected to inform future partnerships with additional Canadian post-secondary institutions, supporting the long-term sustainability of officer education and force generation for the CAF.

The establishment of this new pathway complements key initiatives to improve the CAF recruiting process. Modernization efforts are already having a positive impact on the CAF’s ability to grow and rebuild to its authorized strength.

Quotes

Quick facts

• The CAF will provide military supervision on campus and may provide military and support personnel to enable the enhanced aspects of this pathway, including leadership and ethics training, fitness programming, health and wellness support, and second official language instruction.

Four RRU bachelor’s degrees are available for academic year 2026/2027:

• Bachelor of Science in Environmental Science

• Bachelor of Arts in Justice Studies

• Bachelor of Arts in Professional Communication

• Bachelor of Business Administration (Innovation and Sustainability)

The pathway will initially be open to ROTP candidates and will expand to include the University Training Plan for Non‑Commissioned Members in future phases.

Noah Note: Following the RCNs own similar announcement, we're starting to see a recongition that part of the military training and recuitment pipeline needs to run through our educational ecosystem if we want to achieve both our strengrh goals and tackle gaps in oir trades.

One of the things I always say, Canada has an oversized education system for our size, and it is one if our biggest stregnths. Canadians overrepresent internationally as foreign students. Canadians are generally among the top countries with post-secondary education globally.

Leveraging existing academic and educational infrastructure is part of the whole-of-society security approach. It is a foundational level of our National Defence to not only have a heabily post-secondary system, but also to integrate it into the defence concersation, both in things liek R&D and how we can leverage educational capacity to fill teaining shortfalls.

So of course I'm happy to see it. Good job everyone!

Prairies Economic Development Canada investing more than $8.2 million in Saskatchewan to boost made‑in‑Canada defence capabilities

April 24, 2026 – Yorkton, Saskatchewan – PrairiesCan

In a rapidly changing world, Canada’s security and sovereignty depend on having the capacity to build, maintain, and supply critical equipment and services right here within our borders.

Today, the Honourable Buckley Belanger, Secretary of State for Rural Development, on behalf of Eleanor Olszewski, Minister of Emergency Management and Community Resilience and Minister responsible for Prairies Economic Development Canada (PrairiesCan), announced more than $8.2 million in federal funding through the Regional Defence Investment Initiative (RDII), for three projects in the Yorkton area. These funds will support the growth and integration of Canadian small and medium-sized businesses into domestic and international defence supply chains.

The investments announced today are:

• Parkland Welding & Machine Ltd. and PWM Hydraulics Ltd. (PWM) in Yorkton will expand its engineering, advanced manufacturing, fabrication, assembly, testing and proofing capabilities through the addition of CNC machining, robotics, and quality-control laboratory, enabling domestic production of defence products for customers in Canada and NATO allies. PrairiesCan is providing a repayable investment of $5 million towards this project

• Prairie Agricultural Machinery Institute in Humboldt will create an advanced military engineering and testing facility to provide off-road and on-road heavy-vehicle testing, hot and cold environmental chambers, and robotic and drone testing supported by data analytics for prairie manufacturers to meet domestic and international standards. PrairiesCan is providing $3 million in non-repayable funding towards this new capacity

• Saskatchewan Polytechnic’s Digital Integration Centre of Excellence (DICE) in Saskatoon will develop and test a low-cost multi-agent artificial intelligence drone system for autonomous command and control. This will strengthen Canada’s sovereign industrial base by delivering domestically developed counter-Uncrewed Aerial System (UAS) capabilities. PrairiesCan’s non-repayable investment of $277,000 will support this project.

Growing regional defence capacity on the Prairies reduces reliance on foreign suppliers while creating good jobs and long-term economic opportunities at home.

Today’s announcement aligns with the Government of Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy (DIS) which aims to equip the Canadian Armed Forces by expanding domestic production, strengthening supply chains, and reducing reliance on foreign technology. These investments will help grow Saskatchewan’s defence manufacturing sector, create good jobs, advance research and development, and bring new technologies to market, supporting long-term economic opportunities.

Secretary of State Belanger also highlighted recent government measures to build an economy where Canadians are empowered with greater security, certainty, and a lower cost of living, including the suspension of the federal fuel excise tax until Labour Day 2026. This is expected to reduce Canadians’ bill at the gas station by 10 cents per litre on regular gasoline and 4 cents on diesel. The government is also temporarily suspending the federal fuel excise tax on aviation fuels.

Cutting the tax on gasoline and diesel is a responsible measure that will reduce operating costs for truckers and businesses in the food, agriculture, housing, construction, and delivery sectors. With lower costs and greater financial strength, businesses can hire more workers, confidently build, and export more products to global markets.

Quotes

Quick facts

• Investments under the Defence Industrial Strategy, including this RDII funding, will contribute to Canada spending two percent of gross domestic product on defence in 2025–26.

• Increasing investments in core military capabilities, building up Canadian industry, and dual-use investments are putting Canada on a pathway to meet the new North Atlantic Treaty Organization Defence Investment Pledge to invest five percent of gross domestic product by 2035.

• The Canadian defence industry contributes nearly $10 billion to the gross domestic product and supports over 81,000 jobs.

• The RDII is a three-year $379.2 million national program delivered by Canada’s seven Regional Development Agencies that aligns with the Defence Industrial Strategy, advancing Canada’s ability to rebuild, rearm, and reinvest in its military while strengthening supply chains, readiness, and international partnerships.

• PrairiesCan continues to accept RDII applications from eligible businesses and organizations operating across the Prairie provinces.

The Government of Canada, through Prairies Economic Development Canada, is investing in Winnipeg-based defence suppliers to help them expand both their defence and civilian offerings

April 24, 2026 – Winnipeg, Manitoba – PrairiesCan

The global environment is changing, and Canada’s security and sovereignty depend on having the domestic capacity to build, maintain, and supply critical military equipment and national defence services here at home.

Today, the Honourable Rebecca Chartrand, Minister of Northern and Arctic Affairs and Minister responsible for the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency, on behalf of the Honourable Eleanor Olszewski, Minister of Emergency Management and Community Resilience and Minister responsible for Prairies Economic Development Canada, announced $19.5 million in federal funding through the Regional Defence Investment Initiative (RDII) for three Winnipeg-based projects that will help strengthen Canada’s defence industrial capacity:

• Magellan Aerospace Limited’s establishment of an advanced machining centre in Winnipeg to enhance production capabilities necessary for aircraft components used in a variety of military aircraft. This represents a federal investment of $8 million.

• StandardAero’s expansion of their Winnipeg campus for dual-use aerospace maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) capacity, including the acquisition and installation of new equipment, and integration of advanced digital technologies. This represents a federal investment of $8 million.

• Win-Shield Devices’ establishment of a manufacturing facility for personal protection equipment for military and civilian applications, including inclusive respirators. This represents an investment of $3.5 million.

These investments will help strengthen Manitoba’s aerospace and manufacturing sectors, grow industrial capacity in Winnipeg, and ensure Canadian companies are better positioned to support dual defence and civilian needs. In support of the Government of Canada’s commitment to build a strong Canada and build more of what we need within our borders, these projects are expected to create over 150 jobs, maintain more than 100 jobs, and support more than 10 small and medium-sized businesses in Manitoba.

Quotes

Quick facts

• The Canadian defence industry contributes nearly $10 billion to our gross domestic product and supports more than 81,000 jobs.

• Winnipeg is home to the operational headquarters of the Royal Canadian Air Force and Canadian NORAD region.

• Manitoba is home to two Canadian Forces bases: CFB Shilo and CFB Winnipeg (17 Wing).

• The RDII is a three-year, $379.2 million national program delivered by Canada’s seven Regional Development Agencies. It aligns with the Defence Industrial Strategy, and advances Canada’s ability to rebuild, rearm, and reinvest in its military while strengthening supply chains, readiness, and international partnerships.

• PrairiesCan continues to accept RDII applications from eligible businesses and organizations operating across the Prairie provinces.

April 24, 2026 – Ottawa, Ontario – National Defence

The Department of National Defence’s Sexual Misconduct Support and Resource Centre is introducing its new name: the Defence Community Support and Resource Centre (DCSRC). This change reflects its expanded mandate to support members of the Defence Community affected by racism, while continuing to support those affected by sexual misconduct.

While maintaining its strong foundation and supports for those affected by sexual misconduct, the DCSRC is expanding its services to members of the Defence Community affected by racism, including through the 24/7 Support Line and Response and Support Coordination Program. It has also been entrusted with the design and delivery of Restorative Engagement on Systemic Racism, required through the Canadian Armed Forces Systemic Racism Class Action Settlement.

In support of its expanded mandate, the DCSRC is providing specialized training to its staff to strengthen their capacity to support individuals affected by racial discrimination and racial harassment. The organization continues to consult and engage with communities affected by racism and those affected by sexual misconduct to tailor support services to reflect community priorities and experiences.

This change follows consultations held between October 2025 and January 2026 with all the communities we serve. This also strengthens the DCSRC’s established inclusive, trauma-informed approach while reflecting its evolving responsibilities and its continued commitment to supporting the Defence community.

Quotes

Quick facts

• The organization is expanding its mandate to support members of the Defence community affected by racism.

• The Defence community includes currently serving and former Canadian Armed Forces members, Canadian Coast Guard personnel, National Defence public service employees, Cadets and Junior Canadian Rangers, and their families.

• Members of the Defence Community can call 1-844-750-1648 to get supportive counselling.

On April 20, Team SkyAlyne was pleased to join the Royal Canadian Air Force in marking the start of flying for the CT-102B Astra II (Grob G 120TP) aircraft at 15 Wing Moose Jaw as part of the Future Aircrew Training (FAcT) program.

These initial operations are focused on instructor pilots, who are conducting flying activities to support course development, as part of our efforts to revamp the RCAF ab-initio training ecosystem. This ‘Train the Trainer’ phase will help establish standardized procedures and refine the training syllabus before student pilots begin their flying journey.

“To achieve Astra II flight ops, everyone has worked together,” said Kevin Lemke, General Manager of SkyAlyne. “This outcome-focused mindset sets FAcT apart. The way our teams are going about this work gives me high confidence that our FAcT Enterprise is on the right track.”

When in service in the RCAF, the CT-102B Astra II will serve as the Basic Flying Training aircraft. 15 Wing Moose Jaw will become the new home of the Basic Flying Training program, succeeding the Primary Flying Training syllabus currently conducted at Southport, MB. The two-seater aircraft is powered by the Rolls-Royce M250-B17F turbine engine, which produces up to 456 shaft horsepower. Paired with a typical operating weight in the range of approximately only 1,500kg, the result is a highly capable and responsive aircraft.

As additional aircraft are delivered to Canada, the Astra II fleet at 15 Wing Moose Jaw will continue to grow to a total fleet of 23, as SkyAlyne develops the core platform for basic flight training under the new program. The FAcT program includes updates to curriculum design, simulation, and live flying components, with the goal of creating an integrated training environment aligned with RCAF operational requirements.

There are currently five CT-102Bs delivered to 15 Wing Moose Jaw, with additional deliveries continuing throughout 2026 and into 2027.

Noah Note: A wonderful achievement for SkyAlyne and the RCAF. This marks the official beginning of the FACT era, one that will see nesrly the entirety of the RCAF training fleet revitalized with new aircraft, training infrastructure, and and facilities meant to take the RCAF into the fifth-generation.

Incredibly proud of everyonws work so far, and for SkyAlyne’s great ability to keep things updated!

One of the key and differentiating technologies behind MDA AURORA™ broadband and direct-to-device (D2D) satellite products has reached a landmark phase. We have begun shipping the first of the more than 10,000 Prime 2.0 space-grade chips to be manufactured, tested and designated ready for integration into the satellite’s electronically steered phased array antenna. Designed by MDA Space, these application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) are the most integrated digital beamforming chips on the market for space-based antenna arrays, and introduce a number of benefits for satellite operators.

A Mighty Brain

The Prime 2.0 mixed-signal ASIC, which combines analog and digital functionalities, is the cornerstone of the MDA AURORA™ direct radiating arrays (DRA). Multiple chips are integrated into the receiving and transmission antennas, and this network digitally processes data to form and steer hundreds of beams in different directions simultaneously. The system is modular, meaning the number of chips can be customized in accordance with the number of antenna elements and beams required.

Currently available in lower frequency L—and S—bands, it delivers truly unique capabilities in higher frequency Ka-band with direct sampling, a feature that MDA Space was the first to demonstrate successfully last year. With direct sampling, the chip forms and steers beams without having to convert to intermediate frequencies before analog to digital conversion. As a result, the system consumes less power and requires fewer hardware components, so the satellite is lighter and comes at a lower cost, while improving flexibility thanks to the advanced digital signal processing embedded in the chip. Most importantly, this enables satellite operators to focus service when and where on the planet their customers need it the most, with agility.

Integration With Precision

The next phase for the Prime 2.0 chips is integration into higher-level assemblies. Just as with pronged plugs that connect to wall outlets, the ASIC is equipped with more than 900 pins to connect to printed circuit boards (PCBs). Organized in a ball grid array, each pin serves a specific function, such as transmitting RF or digital signals.

The PCBs are designed to ensure optimal performance when all of the components are soldered together. Integration will take place on the automated surface-mount technology line (SMT) at our new high-volume manufacturing facility in Montréal.

Across Canada’s defence and security sector, significant effort has been made to support veterans as they transition from military service into civilian careers.

Organizations have invested in recruitment initiatives, onboarding programs, and internal development pathways designed to help veterans succeed once they are hired.

Yet an important question has remained largely unexplored:

What happens next?

This spring, ADGA Group is convening a select group of industry partners to examine that question through A Leadership Lab for Impact and Executive Sponsorship (ALLIES). With veterans forming the pilot cohort, the initiative focuses on how military leadership experience is understood, translated, and advanced within civilian defence organizations.

Participating organizations include CAE, Thales, Calian, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Leonardo, and SEA Canada, reflecting a broad cross-section of the defence ecosystem.

Building on Strong Foundations

Each of the organizations participating in ALLIES has made meaningful investments in supporting veterans, from recruitment and transition initiatives to internal development programs that enable continued growth within their teams.

These efforts have strengthened the defence and security workforce and reflect a shared commitment across the sector to recognizing the value of military experience.

ALLIES builds on this foundation by creating space to examine how that experience is interpreted across organizations and how it shapes long-term career progression.

Moving Beyond Established Models

Many existing approaches are designed within the context of a single organization, shaped by its structures, priorities, and definitions of leadership.

ALLIES expands the lens.

By bringing together veterans from multiple companies, the initiative enables a broader view of how leadership developed through military service is interpreted across the sector. It creates an environment to explore shared patterns, common challenges, and the factors that influence progression into senior roles.

The focus is on generating insight at a systems level, where differences in organizational context, role expectations, and visibility can significantly shape how leadership is recognized and advanced.

Unlocking a Critical Leadership Advantage

Veterans bring deep experience in leading teams, operating in complex environments, and making decisions under pressure, capabilities that align directly with the demands of Canada’s defence industry.

Translating that experience into civilian leadership pathways, however, is not always straightforward.

“ALLIES creates an opportunity to better align around the value veterans bring and to ensure that experience is fully leveraged across the sector. In our industry, we collaborate extensively on technology and capability, but we rarely step back to examine how leadership itself is understood across organizations,” said LGen Jean-Marc Lanthier (Ret’d), Chief Executive Officer and President of ADGA Group. “ALLIES creates an opportunity to better align around the value veterans bring and to ensure that experience is fully leveraged across the sector.”

Differences in how leadership is interpreted, particularly in areas such as business development, executive readiness, and cross-functional roles, can influence how veterans progress over time. Greater alignment across organizations has the potential to unlock more consistent and impactful leadership pathways.

A Collective View of Progression

At the core of ALLIES is a shift in perspective, from individual experience to collective understanding.

By convening participants across organizations, the initiative enables a level of comparison and insight that is not visible within a single company. It allows for a deeper exploration of how leadership pathways evolve, where friction points emerge, and what conditions support progression.

“ALLIES was designed to create visibility where it doesn’t currently exist,” said Erika Coghill, Director, Marketing & Communications at ADGA and architect of the initiative. “We’ve made meaningful progress in supporting veterans into the workforce. This is about understanding how their leadership experience continues to translate once they are in, and what influences how far they go.”

Strengthening the Ecosystem

The collaborative nature of ALLIES reflects a broader recognition that leadership development extends beyond organizational boundaries.

As veterans move across roles, functions, and companies throughout their careers, their experience becomes part of a wider ecosystem. Understanding how that experience is interpreted at different points along that journey is essential to realizing its full value.

Bringing organizations together to explore these dynamics marks a step toward a more aligned and intentional approach to leadership across Canada’s defence sector.

Looking Ahead

As the pilot cohort progresses, ALLIES will identify key themes and insights that can be shared more broadly across the defence and security ecosystem.

Engagement with organizations such as the Ottawa Veterans Task Force will help extend the reach of these insights, contributing to ongoing efforts that support veterans across the sector.

Insights from the cohort are also expected to inform the development of leadership-focused initiatives within Invest Ottawa’s Defence Innovation Hub, strengthening the connection between talent, leadership, and innovation.

“Veterans bring exceptional leadership, operational experience, and mission focus that are critical to the strength of Canada’s defence and security sector.” Sonya Shorey, President and CEO of Invest Ottawa said “Veterans bring exceptional leadership, operational experience, and mission focus that are critical to the strength of Canada’s defence and security sector. Initiatives like ALLIES play an important role in advancing that leadership, ensuring it continues to evolve and translate effectively within industry, strengthening both individual pathways and sector-wide capability. This work will help us execute on the ambitious strategy we have established for Canada’s Capital Region as a global defence innovation hub. Together, as a unified ecosystem, we are bringing talent, technology, and industry together to serve Canada, our Forces, and allies with even greater impact.”

At its core, ALLIES is about ensuring that the leadership developed through military service is fully understood, recognized, and positioned to shape the future of Canada’s defence and security community.

NATO’s Defence Innovation Accelerator for the North Atlantic (DIANA), on behalf of Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC), has awarded a research and development (R&D) contract to HonuWorx, a UK‑based technology company specialising in undersea robotics systems. This marks the first R&D contract awarded on behalf of a NATO Ally under NATO DIANA’s Rapid Adoption Service.

Developing undersea capabilities

Under the new R&D contract, HonuWorx will conduct an engineering study to extend the operating depth of its undersea systems. The work will include development of a high-fidelity simulation suite to demonstrate mission potential in challenging operational environments, reducing technical risk and supporting the initial steps toward a deployable system.

DIANA’s Rapid Adoption Service

The contract follows DRDC’s decision to engage DIANA and its Rapid Adoption Service to identify a DIANA innovator capable of addressing a Canadian capability need.

The Rapid Adoption Service enables NATO Allies and NATO bodies to co‑develop, prototype, acquire and deploy innovative technologies at speed and at scale. Under the Rapid Adoption Service framework, DIANA can award R&D and prototype contracts on behalf of Allies through an “opt‑in programme,” reducing administrative barriers and accelerating adoption timelines. Successfully demonstrated prototypes can then transition through to production without further competition.

“The Rapid Adoption Service is designed to help Allies move faster from identified capability need to real-world solutions,” said Jyoti Hirani-Driver, Acting Managing Director of NATO DIANA. “This contract with Defence Research and Development Canada and HonuWorx shows how Allied nations can quickly and collaboratively leverage DIANA to turn innovation into operational capability.”

For this contract, DIANA’s legal, commercial and adoption teams worked closely with DRDC to co‑develop the contract specifications and establish the opt‑in programme under the Rapid Adoption Service, enabling DIANA to act on Canada’s behalf. HonuWorx was selected after having participated in DIANA’s highly competitive Critical Infrastructure and Logistics Challenge in 2025. During Phase 1 of the DIANA programme, the company was paired with COVE, the DIANA accelerator site in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, where it worked closely with end users and technical experts to refine its solution.

DIANA’s Rapid Adoption Service directly supports NATO’s Rapid Adoption Action Plan, agreed by NATO Heads of State and Government at the 2025 Hague Summit, which aims to reduce technology adoption timelines across the Alliance to a maximum of 24 months.

Noah Note: HonuWorx is an interesting company. They get a lot of love from the NATO crowd, and are a long-time partner to another Canadian golden child in Cellula Robotics. The two have been working together for a few years now to develop the Loggerhead concept, with the partnership finding success in trialing several autonomouc concepts, most recently deploying an ROV from an autonomous XLUUV.

Loggerhead is very similar to Guardian, slightly bigger in size. Both utilize Cellula’s Hydrogen fuel-cell system. The key difference is that Guardian is designed as a flexible, customizable platform for customers to tailor to their needs. Loggerhead, by comparison, is designed to operate as a ‘Mothership’, utilizing a Tethered Communications Buoy and dedicated ROV for Subsea Monitoring and Inspection.

It is designed to autonomous map and monitor critical undersea infrastructure, something very important for Canada in an era where there is increasing risk of targeting against critical infrastructure like subsea cables, which of course you can read all about here. It makes sense that, with the DRDC already tightly collaborating with Cellula on the Uncrewed Underwater Surveillance System, that they would also look to close partners of the company to provide specific solutions.

Maybe this gives hope to those wanting to see some movement on Herne, another Cellula collaboration with BAE. Imagine that paired with the River-class. Could fit in the Mission Bay after all!

MONTREAL, April 22, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Volatus Aerospace Inc. (TSX: FLT) (OTCQB: TAKOF) (FSE: ABB.F) (“Volatus” or the “Company”), a Canadian-headquartered global aerospace and defence company, today announced the appointment of Major General (Ret’d) Peter M. “Pete” Fesler to its Advisory Board, completing the formation of a multinational group of senior defence leaders aligned with Canada’s evolving Defence Industrial Strategy.

Major General Fesler brings more than 27 years of service in the United States Air Force, including command of the 1st Fighter Wing and senior leadership roles at NORAD, where he served as Deputy Director of Operations responsible for aerospace warning and control across North America. A command pilot with over 2,200 flight hours in F-15 and F-22 aircraft and more than 50 combat missions, he is widely recognized for his expertise in continental defence, air and missile defence, and joint operations.

This appointment brings together a highly experienced advisory group spanning Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom, with leadership backgrounds across NORAD, NATO, and allied joint operations, at a time when Canada is increasing focus on sovereign defence capability and continental security.

The Advisory Board includes Lieutenant-General (Ret’d) Christopher J. Coates, former Commander of Canadian Joint Operations Command and Deputy Commander of NORAD, and Major General (Ret’d) Gary Deakin, CBE, former Chief of Staff within NATO command structures and a senior advisor on defence strategy and transformation.

The Company also confirmed that Lieutenant-General (Ret’d) Andrew Leslie, a member of its Board of Directors and former Commander of the Canadian Army, will serve as Chair of the Advisory Board.

“General Fesler brings a deep operational understanding of North American defence and the evolving threat environment,” said Glen Lynch, CEO of Volatus Aerospace. “His experience, alongside that of Lieutenant-General Leslie, General Coates, and General Deakin, establishes a level of strategic insight that is directly aligned with Canada’s defence priorities and our role in supporting them.”

The formation of the Advisory Board reflects Volatus’ focus on supporting Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy, including the development of sovereign capabilities in uncrewed and autonomous systems, advanced training, and mission-critical operations. The Company’s integrated platform, spanning design, manufacturing, operations, and data, positions it to support domestic requirements while contributing to allied interoperability.

“Canada’s ability to build and sustain its own aerospace and defence capabilities is increasingly important to both national security and allied commitments,” added Lynch. “A stronger Canadian industrial base strengthens our role within NORAD and NATO. Volatus is focused on building that capability.”

“I am honoured to join Volatus Aerospace at this important point in the evolution of North American defence,” said Major General (Ret’d) Peter Fesler. “The need for integrated, scalable, and operationally proven capabilities continues to grow, and Volatus is well positioned to support both Canadian and allied missions.”

About Volatus Aerospace Inc.

Volatus Aerospace Inc. is a Canadian-controlled global aerospace and defence company delivering integrated uncrewed systems, aerial intelligence, and mission-critical operational services. The Company provides unmanned aerial systems, aerial intelligence services, autonomy software, and advanced training solutions supporting civil infrastructure, public safety, and defence markets.

Through its integrated platform—combining manufacturing, operations, training, and technology development—Volatus Aerospace enables the adoption and scaling of autonomous systems while supporting sovereign aerospace capability development in Canada and allied markets.

The Company operates a global platform supporting drone operations, pilot training, equipment sales, and data services while continuing to expand its capabilities in autonomy, remote operations, and next-generation aerial technologies.

Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains statements that constitute “forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including statements regarding the plans, intentions, beliefs, and current expectations of the Company with respect to future business activities, events, developments and operating performance. Often, but not always, forward-looking information and forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “seeks”, “strategy” or “believes” or variations (including negative variations) of such words and phrases, or statements formed in the future tense or indicating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” (or other variations of the foregoing) be taken, occur, be achieved, or come to pass. Forward-looking information includes information regarding: (i) the business plans, business outlook and expectations of the Company; and (ii) expectations for other economic, business, and/or competitive factors.

Forward-looking information is based on currently available competitive, financial, and economic data and operating plans, strategies, or beliefs as of the date of this news release, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. Such factors may be based on information currently available to the Company, including information obtained from third-party industry analysts and other third-party sources, and are based on management’s current expectations or beliefs. Any and all forward-looking information contained in this news release is expressly qualified by this cautionary statement.

Investors are cautioned that forward-looking information is not based on historical facts but instead reflects expectations, estimates or projections concerning future results or events based on the opinions, assumptions and estimates of management considered reasonable at the date the statements are made. Forward-looking information and forward-looking statements reflect the Company’s current beliefs and is based on information currently available to it and on assumptions it believes to be not unreasonable in light of all of the circumstances. In some instances, material factors or assumptions are discussed in this news release in connection with statements containing forward-looking information. Such material factors and assumptions include but are not limited to: the commercialization of drone flights beyond visual line of sight and potential benefits to the Company; and meeting the continued listing requirements of the TSX. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended. The forward-looking information contained herein is made as of the date of this news release and, other than as required by law, the Company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or results or otherwise. There can be no assurance that forward-looking information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information.

Noah Note: And here I thought Volatus would give me a break this week. The company continues to build up it's veteran leadership, something they started heavily doing last year as part of their first wave of expansion. Fesler joins a pretty stacked group including Leslie, along with folks like Larry D. Taylor and Ian McDougall.

Certainly help as the company tries to position itself as Canada’s big integrator and one-stop. The company is trying hard to build the foundation, but eventually there has to be some big results.

Happy Wednesday

Another week, another Q&A for us. This one was very weird, so let me apologize if this isnt to the usual quality. I struggled to get through this one, but you guys asked a lot of cool questions this week, and managed to stay off a lot of the usual bloat! So I think this Let's Talk is especially good.

As always you can ask your questions, and vote on others, over on our Slido page. It will be up until Monday! A lot of you sent stuff in DMs also but I prefer the stuff there as it can be voted on and also kept open to everyone. If you enjoy my content also consider supporting TNSR over on our Kofi!

Q1. Do you know if the M203A1 currently used will be used on CMAR, or if a new 40mm system will be chosen?

The 203 is still kicking around; however, CMAR is expected to get new Colt Eagle 40mm launchers. That has been the expectation from most people for quite a while now. There won't be a competition; we'll go with what Colt offers. That's the benefit of having a mandated monopoly.

The Eagle is a good replacement. It has a side-opening, fully ambidextrous breech and a Double-Action XT trigger mechanism; the side opening allows for additional munitions incompatible with the 203. It isn't revolutionary by any means, but it is a modern option for replacing legacy underbarrel systems.

No contract has been signed as far as I know, but it is definitely in the plans.

Q2. Any news on the new clothing and equipment suite the Army has been working on for a few years? CCUE, DICE, etc.

There is steady progress on several fronts. It's been admittedly slow, but the new money coming in is pushing a few things ahead. The Caiman order from like a month or so ago is an example of such.

General rollout for a lot of the SOCEM stuff is coming next year into 2028. CCUE follows that too. New Dress is a bit more in flux. I have heard a few timelines for 2027. I can't specify a quarter or such.

DICE has progressed well, and it has done well to prep for a lot of the stuff being rolled out to the remainder of the Army, with the Caiman and the new plate carrier especially going a long way in helping develop and trial potential options.

Now, though, the focus is on CCUE, which again is rolling out next year so long as Logistik doesn't fuck up. Having seen the catalogue? It looks nice. However, I will await to hear how people react first.

Q3. Is there any talk around considering low-cost cruise missiles like CMMT? I know JSM and JASSM have been considered before, but they're monsters cost-wise.

Of course, it's been a discussion, and really, it's a discussion everyone is having these days. There isn't a specific project or mandate to investigate these kinds of solutions; Industry is trying to sell them, sure.

But almost everyone recognizes that current production of critical munitions isn't at a stage where it is sustainable in a high-intensity environment. Keeping in mind, of course, that we don't manufacture our own munitions, and that funding is limited on top of that?

Cheap, scalable munitions that might not be as capable or advanced as, say, a JSM, but still provide the long-range strike capability that is good enough? That is something that we certainly have interest in. Stuff like Rusty Dagger, WOLF, or even something like the Powered JDAM are all potential future candidates to fill that role.

However, that depends on the requirements and demands the RCAF sets out. JSM and LRASM are both coming, that ain't a question, but can they be supplemented by another munition? Most likely, yeah.

Q4. Will there be any investment towards increasing small arms ammunition production alongside the more splashy 155mm investments?

It's in the plans, but it isn't the priority. Critical munitions like 155mm take priority of investment and focus because of the high demand we're seeing and our own conflict expectations.

Keep in mind, scaling 155mm is both far more expensive and takes significant amounts of time. That makes it more imperative of a focus over other munitions. However, to make you feel better, the Feds are looking at the entire Munition Supply, including here.

What comes of those plans? I don't know. We're in the early days there of investigating and engagement, but it is in the discussions at least, and there is a desire to increase production.

Funny enough, this is one area where the Feds could accomplish some quick wins if we didn't have an extensive buyback hampering our civilian side of things.

Q5. Are there any updates on new NVGs since the competition was restarted in November?

The update is everything is delayed now, and the CAF continues to suffer a critical shortage of Night Vision Systems because someone was pissy about the requirements. That's the real story. The Canadian Army lacks a night-fighting capability because we don't have modern equipment, and we certainly don't have anywhere near the numbers we need.

Keep in mind here that Night Vision Systems Modernization is not a project, but an initiative. It includes several different systems under procurement. Night Vision Systems is part of Phase 2, but that also includes laser aiming devices and hand-held medium-range thermal imagers to complement SOPHIE.

With NVGs delayed, now everything else has been delayed so we can run things back again. All to select the same L3Harris solution we did last time, because no matter what, it was going to win. That isn't me hating everyone else, but like, come on. There is a reason we went with L3, and it isn't 'Army loves American' shit.

There should be a decision this year. I don't know the timelines for the rest of Phase 2; they're a bit in flux. Until then, we have the limited AN/PVS-14 as our best options. All because someone was upset they couldn't provide what was asked.

Q6. I believe the -147s were originally bought with the plumbing for an AAR probe. Has there been any talk of adding the probes to extend Arctic operations?

We bought our Chinooks with the Robertson Extended Range Fuel System (ERFS). That provided a significant range increase over the baseline F model, I believe around an extra 400km of baseline range. That has been enough for us.

As for the Arctic? Absolutely. It is an active conversation the nTACS team has had since the beginning. As well as a desire for more Chinooks in general, there is debate on whether the Block II Chinook with extended fuel tanks is a better option for us over a long-range platform like the MV-75.

Keep in mind, the nTACS team debated actively if we even needed a Medium Helicopter in our future. Really, the Chinook has the payload capacity and versatility we really need to operate effectively in the Arctic.

The MV-75 is cool, if you believe Bell, but it isn't quite in the class that we believe we need to respond to potential emergencies in the Arctic. It has speed, sure, but the current Chinooks get out there with enough range, and again, have that higher capacity.

The plan is to hopefully double the Chinook fleet, if not push to 40 or 50. That's what the nTACS team would like to see, at least. That is regardless of anything, so yeah, they expect it to be used up there. The issue now is too few for so much demand.

Q7. With regards to LUV, the Roshel Senator (and I assume the other options too) comes in MRAP and non-MRAP versions. Does CA want mostly one or the other, or a mix?

Okay, so... if you actually read the LUV RFI/ITQ, you'll notice that there is actually a distinction in Phase II for both Armoured and Unarmoured vehicles. The project sets out the expectations for both fleets in terms of numbers.

HOWEVER, this isn't a strict requirement. At the end of the day, LUV would like something with protection; fairly decent protection at that, if possible. The modern battlespace is full of hazards, and there is a certain minimal level of survivability that is expected of modern platforms.

If the Army wanted? Sure. Although, make note that the cost difference between base Senator variants is so minuscule that one could argue it is better financially in the long run to just go with the MRAP. Keep in mind, all Senator variants maintain some baseline level of STANAG protection. It's just up to the customer how far they take it.

The same goes for almost all the others, save add-on kits, which are a separate thing. JLTVs have the add-on kits, but again, we would likely procure those as well just from the financial and situational standpoint.

Q8. With a modernized port of Churchill, will CCG require more program icebreakers to support the extended shipping season being discussed?

No, firstly because you don't really know if you need a program for that; you gotta see the plan. Secondly, because in this case, it ain't the CCG's responsibility. Nor does Arctic Gateway expect the CCG to do so. Sure, they could request it, but right now almost everyone agrees Arctic will be supporting any such effort themselves.

If something changes, then we can discuss what's needed. However, for now, we ain't looking at using the CCG to keep Churchill open.

Q9. Are there any public press releases or sketches of the Irving shipyard expansion? I’m struggling to envision how they’ll fit 3 more hulls in production at once.

Here's a photo of three being worked on at various stages at once. Irving has been infilling part of the harbour the last year as part of their broader expansion for future naval programs. The primary thing you're looking for is the Land Level Expansion Project, which aims to create approximately 13 acres of additional yard space by dredging and infilling part of the harbour.

That land-level area, where various module blocks will be brought out of assembly to be joined together, is the main focus of expansion. Not everything is done in the Assembly Hall. There are also additional infrastructure upgrades under works, such as the new OmniLift.

Space isn't as big an issue as some believe. There are far more bottlenecks in the supply chain that delay the speed of the River-class delivery as well. Keep in mind that not all the work will be directly at Halifax, either. There's also work being done to expand Marine Fabricators' fabrication capacity, one of those supply issues.

Working on six is possible; it's just not going to be six all being constructed at the same stage, at the same time. It will be six at various stages of construction, be that in the assembly hall, being welded together, or being fitted with critical systems.

When looked at through that lens, it isn't too terribly hard to imagine, I hope!

Q10. What if Russia decided to mine the Northwest Passage for kicks? I don't think I've ever heard of any dedicated mine-hunting platforms in the RCN. Use allies?

We have the Remote Minehunting and Disposal Systems, which could hypothetically be fitted onto any platform with space for a 20ft container. That is equipped with the REMUS AUV and SEAFOX mine disposal vehicle. SH Defence is providing its CUBE Modular container system for the project, while Kraken will be equipping it with their AquaPix synthetic aperture sonar.

That is starting to come into service. I also can't imagine a reality where Russia is mining the NWP. There are far better targets. I would like to see more procured, as I would like to see smaller platforms like the future FASST-V have their own MCM solution that fits them.

Modern mines are scary. They're autonomous, maneuverable, have a long life, and can act as sensor nodes. They are by far one of the scariest things out there in my opinion, and placing a few in the right place can create some serious complications for Canada.

We are taking it seriously, though. The Advanced Naval Capabilities Unit considers MCM and Autonomous Systems related to them as a major priority, and the AOPS have been experimenting with how they could better assist with minehunting and countermeasures.

I don't think we gotta worry about mines up there, but if we do, we ain't going in with nothing.

Q11. Looking at possibly 35 principal surface combatants, how is the Navy thinking about larger unmanned ships? Is there a risk of existing ship orders getting slimmed down?

The Navy is curious about MUSV and LUSV; however, they're taking it slow and cautiously. While some might envision autonomous systems acting as independent combatants, that ain't really the conversation we're having.

We're looking at it more as a collaborative vessel, a partner to future surface combatants rather than a replacement in that role. The Navy is talking about it, but not in the "Let's carry a bunch of MK.70s" role. They see them helping in secondary tasks, maybe potentially as payload carriers.

So far, no numbers have been cut, and it ain't in the books. Certainly not from some new class of autonomous vessels.

Q12. The RN is currently testing the sub-hunting CAPSTONE drone. Could this system be useful for the RCN?

We're already looking at that with the new S-100, lol. We put sonobuoys on a Hammerhead target, and we ain't stopping there. The failure of the Cyclone has kinda pushed the Navy in this direction, where they need to look at potential alternatives, not to replace the Maritime Helicopter, but to supplement it.

It's still in the early stages, but a drone dropping sonobuoys isn't a novel concept. It's something we are actually testing with our new platform as we speak.

Q13. Do you think the CDCs should/will be similar to the Italian PPA, in how some ships are more capable than others in the class to reach the 20+ ship desire?

I mean, I threw that idea out with Vigilance, that one could procure a set number of 100s and then supplement with 75s. However, I don't see any indication that is a possibility. Right now, the requirements are clear for one vessel, with general uniformity in capabilities.

I get where you're coming from; I think it's an idea that has been floated privately. However, I don't see it. When we start talking about 20 or more combatants, though, I think it raises the question of whether that's a possible avenue... and that's while still getting the desired number of CDCs.

Q14. Do more niche bidders like Armatec or Terradyne have any renders for LUV? Do you think they have a chance?

Terradyne is just the regular Gurkha. Armatec is offering a modern G-Wagon. Neither has shown off any specific LUV proposal publicly, like anything LUV-specific. Armatec barely talks to people in the first place.

Truthfully, I can't see either pulling ahead of the Senator, JLTV, Sabre, or GM here. Like, the roster among those four is so stacked that it would be hard for either to pull out. The Gurkha is another 550-based vehicle like the Senator, but with a worse supply chain, less developed, and while combat-proven in Ukraine as well, not to the same scale. I see no one demanding a modern G-Wagon either.

I like Terradyne. The Gurkha has done great in Ukraine. However, it feels like it's in a competition offering at a level above it at this stage. You feel?

Q15. Are there any plans in the works to procure additional shotguns for the Army?

Not that I know of.

Q16. With the advent of CCAs, could 2-person fighters with a new kind of weapons officer come back into vogue?

Possibly. It's a conversation we're inevitably going to have with Sixth-Gen aircraft, especially as CCAs become a staple part of many air forces. A bit of a simple rule: if we can get away with it, we will. That being, if we don't need an extra pilot? Then we won't see one.

It's possible that developments in machine learning and autonomy get to a stage where only one operator is required to coordinate CCAs. I don't think we're near the stage of true automation, mind you; however, we can get to a stage of functional autonomy, where CCAs operate nearly independently of intervention, only requiring the bare minimum of intervention.

I do think that, no matter what, we will see two-seat configurations with a focus on a dedicated operator for CCAs. However, whether it becomes the standard in the long run? I don't think so.

As technology progresses, and we get better with CCAs, the workload required to operate them in MUM-T will decrease as well, and I believe we will reach the tipping point where only a single pilot is required the vast majority of the time.

Q17. Are there any projects to improve the physical security of bases?

Well, we do have the new base security trade coming to the RCAF, as well as the CUAS Initiative. The primary focus on physical security is focused on perimeter fencing, access control, and threat-detection software.

Trenton, as an example, is getting new anti-ram vehicle barricades, traffic control spikes, and camera systems. I believe Comox is the same. The RMC is getting new fencing infrastructure and anti-ram barriers.

Gagetown's recent funding had security infrastructure built into it. Cold Lake and Bagotville need these kinds of security upgrades, including new fencing and camera systems, as part of the suite of security upgrades for hosting the F-35.

NORAD Northern Basing Infrastructure has security infrastructure built into it. Honestly, most bases are undergoing or, as part of master plans, are looking at renewing physical security infrastructure. New cameras, fences, new gates, new digital infrastructure, and security software for tracking and identification.

Lots of these ain't projects as we know them. They are collections of infrastructure investments that just so happen to align with each other, which isn't very surprising when you consider the security needs for bases are fairly uniform, and most are undergoing fairly large renewals after years of underinvestment.

Q18. You've mentioned that a dedicated sub rescue platform for the RCN is a long way out. Could we lean on the capabilities of our allies in the med-term? How?

We can do sub rescue now. The AOPS participate in exercises regularly to be able to perform it. Yes, it does utilize the existing NATO Submarine Rescue System like others; however, we regularly train to handle a potential submarine rescue.

AOPS ain't tenders, though, and they can do the role if needed, but they ain't optimized for the role. They can take on some containers to do it, but a dedicated vessel with dedicated decompression chambers and extensive medical facilities is always better.

Keep in mind also, we're often talking about tendering submarines, which requires a vessel capable of resupplying and possibly taking part in forward repair in emergencies as well.

That could honestly even be done by something like a JSS or AMB, especially if we have 4/2. They have the facilities and space needed. However, most countries opt for a dedicated vessel to better tailor its capabilities specifically to a submarine's needs.

We will see.

Q19. With the expansion of the training fleet, where could we see these be based day to day? It would be nice to see one stationed around a major reserve like York.

The plan is to base them at Naval Reserve units across the country. That gives reserves a vessel they can train and work on, provides a public-facing vessel for the average person to engage with, especially the youth, and provides the RCN a fleet of vessels that can support security and intelligence operations on the coasts and, more importantly, in the St. Lawrence/Great Lakes.

So, you're in luck! You'll be able to see these vessels quite extensively across the country if all goes to plan.

Q20. What will happen to the old A310s that the RCAF is retiring? Do we sell them for scrap, or would someone else have some use for them?

Scrapyard.

Q21. Any news on the status of the FFLIT program, e.g., possible candidates, etc.?

It's progressing fine. A Requirements Development Contract is set to be signed this year. An execution award is set for the 2029/2030 period with FOC in, I believe, around 2033/2034. A good thing to remember here is CAE.

Like FACT, CAE has significant sway in whatever trainer platform we decide on. Right now, the big two are the KAI/Lockheed TF-50 and the Leonardo M346. There isn't as much hype for the T-7 Red Hawk.

The M346 is interesting because CAE already has experience with the International Flight Training School (IFTS) operating them. It presents an opportunity to align with the NATO Flight Training Europe initiative (NFTE) we joined last year, as well as align NATO Flying Training in Canada (NFTC) to a common platform.

The TF-50 is interesting because of the alignment with the F-35, both being Lockheed products in a sense. There are also some discussions on building them here, though I stress that is hearsay, not a rumor. There is also the fighter aspect, but that isn't at play here.

Those are the two predominantly discussed platforms, with a lot of leaning on the M346 for the benefits of alignment and the ease of CAE, though both are excellent trainers in their own rights. We can't go wrong with either.

Q22. What is the potential for cargo UAVs to enhance or modify traditional replenishment at sea operations? Drone swarms for rapid tactical operations?

I mean, I think they're neat, lol. The RCN sees value in them as a potential tool for resupply. The future JSS UAS will be focused on resupply and cargo transport, so there is absolutely a desire to explore these as an option.

The thing with cargo UAS really depends on what you're discussing. Heavy UAS like Envoy for transporting limited goods and parts across vessels? Sure. That can work. That is fine. However, when you start to get into things like converted helicopters, such as the H145M-based Aerial Logistics Connector? That is a bit less certain.

I don't think those are there quite yet, both in their autonomous capabilities or in our skillset to operate them at scale. That is a significant leap from the platforms we are trialing these days, and while very cool, they are still experimental platforms. They ain't quite at the stage yet where we can have a serious discussion on them, in my opinion.

But smaller stuff like Envoy? Sure. Absolutely, let's have those talks on what they can do! The Navy is!

Remember that you can ask your questions for next week by following this link. Dont be afraid to ask multiple questions if you like!

April 22, 2026 – Parry Sound, ON – National Defence / Canadian Coast Guard

The Canadian Coast Guard’s Inshore Rescue Boat (IRB) program will hold search and rescue training for crews between April 24 and May 11, 2026 in Parry Sound, Ontario.

Training will be carried out during daytime and nighttime hours at the Canadian Coast Guard (CCG) Base in Parry Sound and surrounding waters south to Midland, and north to Britt. The public can expect to see upwards of 10 CCG Zodiac Fast Rescue Craft and helicopters throughout the area. There is no real emergency or danger to the public.

This training certifies and prepares students to respond to marine emergencies during the summer months, such as, but not limited to, medical emergencies, persons overboard, vessels aground, vessels taking on water, and disabled vessels.

Each summer, the Canadian Coast Guard hires post-secondary students and trains them as IRB crews at stations across Canada. These stations provide supplementary search and rescue services during the busy summer boating season. The IRB program provides employment experience and mentorship to post-secondary students.

On the Great Lakes, the Canadian Coast Guard operates six IRB stations. They are located at Britt (Georgian Bay), MacTier (Georgian Bay), Hill Island (St. Lawrence River), Port Lambton (St. Clair River), Thames River (Lake St. Clair) and Long Point (Lake Erie). IRB stations are open annually from May to October.

Quick facts

• IRB crews consist of one coxswain and two crew members. Crews operate on a rotating schedule of 14 days on, 14 days off.

• In the regions where they operate, Inshore Rescue Boat crews are often the first to respond to distress calls from mariners or to those in need of assistance. Across Canada, crews respond to approximately 1,200 incidents each season.

• Crews also provide public education on boating safety and conduct Pleasure Craft Courtesy Checks in partnership with Transport Canada’s Office of Boating Safety Program.

TORONTO — NEO Battery Materials Ltd., a silicon-enhanced battery developer for drones, robotics and physical AI, announced they have entered into a defence technology partnership agreement with the Republic of Korea (ROK) Army’s Capital Mechanized Infantry Division on Apr. 22.

The Capital Mechanized Infantry Division armoured combat unit tasked with defending the capital and conducting counter-offensive missions against North Korean threats.

Through the partnership, NEO and the Capital Mechanized Infantry Division will jointly develop, high-energy, high-power battery technologies for military drones and unmanned systems. The Capital Mechanized Infantry Division intends to deploy the company’s batteries directly to the division’s drone platforms for operator training and field use. Along with the 12th Infantry Division, this integration into a mechanized combat environment will impose strenuous, dynamic power requirements on drones and unmanned systems due to rapid maneuvers and multi-domain operations.

“Innovation of South Korea’s defence technology is highly dependent on the depth of collaboration between military and domestic industry. With the gradual implementation of autonomous solutions, high-performance, Korea-made batteries are no longer solely a procurement consideration but a national security priority. The Capital Mechanized Infantry Division is pleased to initiate work with NEO Battery to advance this priority through close operational integration,” said Major General Seong-gu Kim, Commander of the Capital Mechanized Infantry Division.

“With active defence collaboration spanning institutional, infantry, and mechanized units, NEO is building a diversified operational presence across multiple unit types and commands,” added Spencer Huh, President & CEO of NEO. “The Company will use this multi-engagement strategy as groundwork to penetrate battery supply relationships with higher echelons of command in the ROK Army and, ultimately, the Ministry of National Defense. These organizations’ procurement decisions will carry broader deployment scale and volume implications for NEO.”

Noah Note: I don't tend to discuss NEO when talking about stuff like CPSP bevause their South Korean parentage makes it a bit more complex than that. I will say though that NEO taking a step into degence more heavily, and Canada being an amchor to that, is importsnt in the context of future developments.

UAS, USV, UUV. All of them run off of battery or Cell systems. All of them are looked at to be critical tools in Canada’s future defence, and sadly the current battery supply chain, while getting better with the likes of Kraken and VoltaXplore, is still far off from the svale that we need it to be.

NEO has the capacity to really tackle at that, and so I support any effort they procide to jump into the space. Of course sure, fhis could be leveraged for CPSP, but I think downgrading it to an offset misses the actual picture here, at least to me.

Ottawa, ON – April 8, 2026 — KF Aerospace announced the opening of its new office in downtown Ottawa, marking a significant step in the company's continued expansion across Canada. Strategically located at 340 Maclaren Street, in the Manitoba Métis Federation's (MMF) satellite office, the new space reinforces KF's growing presence in the nation's capital and its commitment to supporting federal programs, partnerships, and long-term growth opportunities.

The Ottawa office represents a key milestone in KF Aerospace's pan-Canadian strategy, positioning the company closer to national decision-makers and industry partners while enhancing its ability to support defence, aerospace, and government initiatives.

"This expansion into Ottawa is a natural evolution of KF Aerospace's growth across Canada," said Gregg Evjen, President of KF Aerospace. "Establishing a presence in the capital allows us to deepen relationships, contribute more directly to national programs, and continue building on our reputation as a trusted partner in Canadian aviation."

The office space is leased from the MMF, the National Government of the Red River Metis, reflecting a longstanding and meaningful relationship with KF Aerospace. The collaboration underscores KF Aerospace's enduring commitment to Indigenous participation and economic inclusion, building on its established presence and partnerships with the MMF.

"Sharing this space with the Manitoba Métis Federation highlights the strength of our relationship and our shared vision for opportunity and inclusion," added Peter Fedak, VP of Defence Programs. "We are proud to continue working together to create pathways for Indigenous participation in aerospace and beyond."

To mark the occasion, KF Aerospace and the MMF hosted an open house on April 8, 2026. The event coincided with the CADSI CAF Outlooks week, welcoming industry partners, government representatives, and stakeholders to explore the new space and celebrate this milestone.

For the MMF, leasing the office space represents another step forward in fostering partnerships that deliver long-term benefits for Red River Métis citizens.

"This collaboration reflects our continued commitment to building strong, strategic partnerships that create meaningful economic opportunities for our citizens," said David Chartrand, President of the MMF. "Our relationship with KF Aerospace is an example of how values alignment, economic opportunities and good procurement principles can lead to long-standing partnerships and lasting impact."

As KF Aerospace continues to grow its footprint nationwide, the Ottawa office will serve as a hub for engagement, collaboration, and future opportunities, further strengthening its role as a leader in Canada's aerospace sector.

About KF Aerospace

We’re all about THE CRAFT.

For over 55 years, KF Aerospace has delivered innovative aircraft solutions for corporate, commercial and military customers worldwide—including OEMs such as Boeing; major airlines such as WestJet, Air Canada, Lynden Air Cargo and Flair Airlines; and the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF). From humble roots in the Okanagan Valley, KF has grown to specialize in aircraft maintenance and modifications, military aircrew training, passenger charter services and cargo flight operations, and leasing—with the same commitment to quality and service established by its founder in 1970. In 2024, KF was awarded with Canada’s Future Aircrew Training (FAcT) Program as part of its partnership with CAE called SkyAlyne.

To learn more visit www.kfaero.ca or contact:

About Manitoba Métis Federation – National Government of the Red River Métis

The Manitoba Métis Federation (MMF) is the democratically elected National Government of the Red River Métis, also known as the Manitoba Métis. The Red River Métis are a distinct Indigenous Nation and People, Canada's Negotiating Partners in Confederation, and the Founders of the Province of Manitoba.

To learn more visit MMF.mb.ca or contact:

A minor one today, but one I thought many of you would appreciate. I know some of you were goping for more renders of the MSMM, and luckily we don't have to wait long! The CCG today put out a few new looks at the future MSMM on social media today.

I thought many of you would appreciate the additional angles and looks. Compared to the original render, this one is far more detailed and includes a number of interesting changes from the first.

Of course, as always, renders should always be taken with salt. They are not always accurate, nor are they always the most detailed. Things can easily be placeholders, or merely conceptual as nature. That's my little disclaimer.

Quickly though, let's do a recap of things: The Mid-Shore Multi-Mission (MSMM) vessels will replace the three mid-shore science vessels (Limnos, Otter Bay, Vector) while also filling the future gap in CCGs medium-sized utility fleet, as many of the current fleet are being replaced by much different, much larger vessels. Six are planned to be acquired in total.

The MSMM are expected to be 45 to 50m in length and a tonnage of < 1000MT. They will have a range of up to 3000nm and an endurance of up to 17 days. The MSMM will also be Ice-Strengthened with the class expected to be rated at minimum Ice Class-1C per DNV standards.

Ice Class 1C signifies that a vessel is designed and strengthened to navigate in light ice conditions, specifically characterized by first-year ice with a thickness of up to 0.6 meters. Per DNV standards, this classification confirms that the ship's hull, propeller, and steering gear are reinforced to withstand the thermal and mechanical stresses of ice interaction.

The MSMM will operate year-round within the Canadian waters of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, the Gulf of St. Lawrence, the Great Lakes, and the St. Lawrence Seaway. On the Atlantic Coast it will be limited to as far as 60° North latitude during the summer months. The majority of the missions will be carried out in the mid-shore range.

The primary tasks for the MSMM fleet will include supporting Ecosystem and Marine Science, Hydrographic Surveys, supporting Aids to Navigation, and helping support SAR activities.

The fleet will also have several secondary tasks on top of these including Light Icebreaking, Maritime Security activities, Conservation and Protection Enforcement, Environmental Response, supporting the Vessels of Concern program, and Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief.

Now that you're caught up we can get into the vessel itself. The most notable change of course is the prominent move away from the more modern, heavily faceted bridge found in a lot of modern Euro-designs, especially Vanguard, to a more traditional, blocky superstructure and forward-leaning bridge that is better suited to the enviornment we expect MSMM to operate in. Much more pronounced flare, more prominent fendering lol. Also easier and cheaper to construct but whose asking…

The enclosed sensor mast has been replaced as well here by the typical lattice mast found on other CCG vessels, if that was ever a shock. This new render also includes a few small details included, such as the twin Radomes and an updated Exhaust Stack.

Moving to the Aft, we have the addition of an A-Frame rated with an SWL at 5000 KG and a centerline winch just behind it. The previous crane has been replaced with a articulated knuckle-boom crane and moved down to the Aft deck. Take note also of the new blue davit positioned at the stern for the deployment of things like CTD Rosettes, Sensors, and ROV.

Overall very different from the first concept, something I did warn was likely to happen, however also still the same in concept. It is not radically different. It was always natural that the first concepts would have some profound changes.

These new renderings tske the concept from the sleek, european origins of Vanguard and creates in it something undoubtedly CCG. A lot of these are merely details that the early concept, as they do, leave out. That's just the nature of these kinds of renderings.

It is a bit weird, admittedly. The design definetly will take some getting used to for some, however, I am happy to see something that is far more likely to look like what the final vessel we will get is. Funny enough, with a bit of work and such she could have made an excellent Kingston replacement.

A new Canada–Asia energy and industrial partnership takes shape in Alberta, linking trade, growth, and sovereign capability while achieving objectives of Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy

EDMONTON, Alberta, April 21, 2026 – A new partnership between the Government of Alberta and Hanwha is emerging at a pivotal moment for Canada’s economic strategy – one that could expand access to growing Asian markets while strengthening the country’s long-term industrial capacity and strategic resilience.

With the Republic of Korea Government announcing that it will eliminate the 3% import tariff on Canadian crude oil as part of the nation’s plan to enhance its relationship with Canada, including partnership on the Canadian Patrol Submarine Project, the conditions are in place for a major shift in bilateral energy trade. For Alberta, the development presents a timely opportunity to diversify market access – an objective increasingly framed as both an economic and national security priority.

Against this backdrop, the Government of Alberta and Hanwha Energy have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to explore long-term collaboration across energy development, industrial expansion, and supply chain infrastructure. The agreement also includes Hanwha Ocean, Hanwha Aerospace and Hanwha Power, in a coordinated, group-wide effort to support deeper bilateral engagement across multiple sectors.

The MOU signing was attended by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, Minister of Jobs, Economy, Trade and Immigration Joseph Schow, Minister of Energy and Minerals Brian Jean, and senior executives from Hanwha.

The scope of the MOU between Alberta and Hanwha reflects this integrated approach, covering energy and natural resource development, defence industrial capabilities, and advanced manufacturing and logistics. It also includes scenarios for collaboration across oil and gas, LNG and hydrogen, carbon capture and storage, as well as systems integration and supply chain development—areas central to Canada’s long-term economic competitiveness and energy security.

The structure of the collaboration is designed to evolve over time. In the near term, expanded trade in crude oil and related resources provides a practical foundation for strengthening bilateral ties and enabling market diversification beyond North America. In the next phase, the focus is expected to broaden to include hydrogen, ammonia-based energy carriers, and carbon management infrastructure, supporting both countries’ transition toward lower-emissions energy systems while reinforcing industrial growth and supply chain resilience.

While anchored in energy, the partnership is also intended to extend into broader industrial and strategic domains. Hanwha Ocean’s participation connects the initiative to its bid for the Canadian Patrol Submarine Project (CPSP), positioning cooperation in Alberta as part of a wider effort to support Canada’s evolving Defence Industrial Strategy (DIS), including the development of sovereign industrial capability, long-term in-service support and sustainment capacity, and a more resilient and regionally anchored defence industrial base.

For Canada, the implications extend beyond a single agreement. The convergence of energy policy shifts and growing Indo-Pacific engagement is creating a window for deeper bilateral cooperation. This initiative signals an intent to translate that opportunity into tangible industrial activity—linking resource development with infrastructure investment, supply chain expansion, and long-term capital deployment.

Quotes

Noah Note: This is the first provincial agreement one of the two CPSP suppliers have made. In the last few weeks Hanwha has been trying to leverage and partner with provincial authorities to bolster their bid. This comes as the Canadian governments has reopened the submitted RFP for a revision period, with both companies having until April 29th to submit their revised proposals.

Part of this comes from a desire to see more economic output being committed too, but also to give both bidders time to revise things in lieu of questions from government and a desire for further clarification. Both companies are now put in the rush to sevure additional partners and add to their bids. Keep in mind that both bids were well over a thousand pages long, with one approaching 2000 pages.

Mid-June is now the new timeframe for an announcement but a decision is likely to be made mid-May from what I hear, that is a preffered supplier will be decided by cabinet. After that contract negotiations will begin, with a hope for a very, very late 2026 award though likely 2027.

Also not mentioned here is the Alberta Defence Team that has been operating since January, and have been very active around the place. I don't know the team well, but they seem great and they've been getting out there enough for me to hear about them a lot. They did not get a shout out, but congrats to them for this.

Obviously securing a provincial partner, especially one like Alberta is a monumental escalation for Hanwha into a domain that we rarely see. Provincial agreements aint common when it comes to Defence procurement, and while the primary focus here in on Energy (because it is alberta lets be real) the reality is that securing some provincial backing goes a way.

Add on the tariff elimination of Alberta crude, amd you have a one-two hit that really goes for the jaw here. I can't say if there will be more, but Hanwha is absolutely looking to get more similar agreements out the gate, snd they aint the only one on Team Korea trying this strategy…

I digress. I can't go blabbing. Then people will beat me up or stuff. Either way this is a relatively simple and uneventful in the agreement itself, but breaking the barrier on government entities as partners, and what follows, is definetly something that shifts the stakes and conversation.

MIRABEL, Quebec, April 21, 2026 — MAS, an L3Harris Technologies (NYSE: LHX) company, and Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) have announced a new framework for collaboration and information sharing to establish an F-35 Air Vehicle Depot in Canada.

The agreement builds on Canada’s selection of MAS as a strategic CF-35 sustainment partner, creating a joint executive steering committee to define depot capabilities, workforce training programs and sustainment solutions. This collaboration will support Canada’s ability to exercise greater in-country control over aircraft upkeep while creating high-skilled jobs.

“Depot-level sustainment means Canada’s aerospace workforce will perform the same advanced maintenance currently done in only a handful of locations worldwide,” said Jason Lambert, President, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance, L3Harris. “Our 40-year fighter sustainment heritage, combined with Lockheed Martin’s 5th Generation expertise, makes this the right partnership at the right time.”

The depot is expected to anchor an industrial framework of approximately 30 Canadian suppliers contributing $3.2 million per jet, across the global fleet of more than 1,325 F-35s.

“This collaboration delivers on Canada’s requirement to develop in-country sustainment capability and to operate and maintain the Canadian F-35 fleet independently,” said Chauncey McIntosh, Vice President and General Manager, F‑35 Program, Lockheed Martin. “With Lockheed Martin’s experience establishing sustainment capabilities around the world, our joint effort with MAS is expected to deliver fleet readiness, air superiority and increased economic benefits.”

The F-35 serves as the backbone of allied air power, with 20 nations committed to purchase more than 3,500 aircraft. L3Harris, one of Canada’s largest defence and security companies, has supported the nation’s aerospace and defence sectors for more than six decades.

About L3Harris Technologies

L3Harris is the Trusted Disruptor in defense tech. With customers’ mission-critical needs always in mind, our employees deliver end-to-end technology solutions connecting the space, air, land, sea and cyber domains in the interest of national security.

Visit L3Harris.com for more information.

About Lockheed Martin

Lockheed Martin is a global defense technology company driving innovation and advancing scientific discovery. Our all-domain mission solutions and 21st Century Security® vision accelerate the delivery of transformative technologies to ensure those we serve always stay ahead of ready.

More information at lockheedmartin.com.

Noah Note: L3 MAS has been one of the major supporters of Lockheed during the F35 review process. The company was selected back in November 2024 as Canada’s strategic partner to provide future maintenance, repair, overhaul and upgrade services for the CF35 fleet.

L3 is the RCAFs ISS Champion. I don't think many would actively deny that. The Companies depot in Mirabel has provided thr RCAF with In-Service Support for nearly forty years, including for the CF188 Hornet, CC150 Polaris, CP140 Aurora, CH148 Cyclone, CH147F Chinook, CT114 Tutor and now (officially) the CC330 Husky fleet. That is on top of the F35.

For L3 the acquisition of the CF35 provided a unique opportunity to leverage constraints in American sustainment capacity at Ogden and Cherry Point to create a proper multinational facility that will not just serve the RCAF but potentially also the USAF and USN.

For L3 the future depot isn't hoping to fill this role, they're quite banking on it. The company makes no attempts to hide that the facilities long-term viability is tied to acting as a major hub for both Canada and the United States. The company is working hard to upgrade it's sevurity architecture to ensure it gets the proper approval to service American F35. The facilities are at a scale to have the excess capacity to servixe bith Canada and expected American demand.

For L3 the estimate is that 1,500 direct and 3,500 indirect jobs will be tied to this future facility, as well as billions of dollars over the liftetime of the F35 in In-Service-Support for both countries. For that reason L3 has been extremely active in attempting to draw thr Federal government to supporting the full 88 CF35.

Of course as of now there is an acceptance that ~32 F35 are likely to be part of the final decision at minimum. I have said it before, but I reiterate. There is zero timeline where 16 was going to be the final number, save none at all.

Always remember that when determining how many aircraft one needs to operate a single squadron, the number of aircraft includes more than just your standard combat-coded fighters, but also inventory for training, testing, backup, and attrition. That alone can represent upwards of a 50-60% increase in airframes compared to merely focusing on combat-coded fighters.

We have contracted the Long-Lead items for 14 more F35. However for companies like L3, the concern is that a major shift, even if only a moderate cut, severly hampers efforts to sevure American support for the Mirabel depot. So the ample action is to lock down and start making the case.

That is what we see here. This isn't new info. Im shocked how many outlets are acting like this is a surprising. We've known the plans forever. However, locking down the agreement, to start setting the stage shows that there is value and economic benefits on the table. For both L3 and Lockheed, who has been heabily criticizing by some in Ottawa for not taking the review seriously, the presentation of such a facility to the public aims to axt as an economic anchor that can be pointed to in the conversation.

Of course it's still American, so people still won't like this idea lol. A good chunk of the average public aint gonna be sold supporting American F35. However they aint the ones that need to be convinced, something many commentators forget in these discussions.

OTTAWA, ON, April 21, 2026 /CNW/ - Canada reached the moon but still lacks its own way to space. Canada is the only country in the G7 that does not have space launch capabilities and must rely on foreign countries, most often the United States, to reach orbit. In a more uncertain and competitive world, Canada cannot rely on others to secure access to space for our economy, our defence, and our future.

Today, the Minister of Transport and the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, the Honourable Steven MacKinnon, introduced the Canadian Space Launch Act to deliver Canadian sovereign space launch capabilities. The Act would enable the government to safely regulate and oversee space launch and re-entry activities conducted from Canadian territory, while also establishing the necessary authorities to provide regulatory certainty to industry, support investment and infrastructure development, and strengthen Canada's ability to meet its international obligations related to space.

Establishing Canadian sovereign space launch capabilities would drive billions in investments, create good paying jobs, increase Canada's sovereignty, reduce our economy's reliance on the United States, and support a commercial space launch and re-entry industry that could be worth $40 billion.

The Canadian Space Launch Act's regulatory framework is key to securing our place in the rapidly growing global space economy while building on Canada's historic contributions to humanity's space innovations. This positions Canada to meet strategic needs, enhance resilience of critical infrastructure and other systems that rely on space assets, while fueling domestic innovation and industry growth and positioning Canada for renewed economic and security partnerships with allies.

Canada must be ambitious to have better control over its launches and stronger measures to reduce costly delays that leave critical infrastructure exposed to decisions beyond our control. As Canada develops greater launch and re-entry capabilities, these provide new opportunities for partnerships, collaboration and capacity building in Canada and with other nations around the world.

Quotes

Quick facts

• In 2022, revenues of the space sector were estimated at $5.0B, with exports reaching $2.0B, and contributed approximately $3.2B to Canada's gross domestic product.

• In 2023, Canada's space workforce grew by 5.9%, creating a record of 13,888 space-related jobs from coast to coast to coast.

• Based on estimates from Deloitte, the domestic space market is projected to reach $40 billion by 2040, and the global space economy is estimated to reach $1.5 trillion by 2032.

• On March 16, 2026, the Honourable David J. McGuinty, Minister of National Defence, announced an historic $200 million investment in core infrastructure for a Canadian-owned spaceport, along with other major new space-related capabilities and initiatives, marking a significant step forward in Canada's sovereign space program as outlined in Security, Sovereignty, Prosperity: Canada's Defence Industrial Strategy.

• The development of a comprehensive launch and re-entry regulatory framework aligns with the Government of Canada's priorities related to economic growth, national defence and sovereignty – directly supporting Canada's Defence Industrial Strategy and National Security Strategy.

Noah Note: A long-awaited moment. I don't think I need to explain the importance of having the proper legal and administrative structure in place to ensure that we can launch from Canada. It has long been a demand of the Space Industry that legistaltion be tabled to give them the reassurance they need that the government is prepared to support domestic launch.

With Canada now in the race to begin launching payloads from Canada this decade, expanding up to the Medium-Lift category by 2035, having the propwr legislation in place now is critical to the success of things like Launch the North.

So I am a very happy boy to see this finally on the table. I have not gone through the legislation itself, but I am sure I will be pleased.

Cellula Robotics Ltd has demonstrated more than 2,000 km of fully submerged endurance with its Envoy Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV), powered by a hydrogen fuel cell, exceeding the platform’s published performance specification in a representative underwater mission profile.

Fully submerged mission exceeded published performance specification in a non-linear underwater profile representative of real subsea operation

Completed fully submerged, the mission provides a realistic indication of usable underwater range beyond a straight-line transit figure. Over the course of the profile, the Envoy AUV executed more than 4,000 turns and manoeuvres, each of which increased energy demand compared with steady, linear travel. This makes the result a more meaningful demonstration of real-world subsea performance in practical operating conditions.

The milestone was achieved using hydrogen fuel cell technology developed with Infinity Fuel Cell and Hydrogen, Inc., whose fuel cell solution supports Envoy’s long-endurance performance below the surface.

“The significance of this result is not just the distance travelled, but that it was achieved fully submerged in a mission profile that better reflects real subsea operations,” said Neil Manning, CEO of Cellula Robotics. “That is what makes the endurance meaningful for operators, with the potential for fewer recoveries, more continuous operations, and greater efficiency offshore.”

For operators, endurance is what turns technical capability into offshore results. Longer fully submerged missions can reduce the number of recoveries and relaunches required, support mission continuity, and make better use of vessel time in programmes where logistics, weather windows, and offshore intervention all affect cost and execution.

The Envoy AUV remained on mission for 385 hours and covered 2,023 km submerged on hydrogen fuel cell power The result demonstrates persistent, long-range AUV performance in a real underwater operating context and reinforces hydrogen fuel cells as a practical enabling technology for extended autonomous subsea operations.

“We are proud to support a milestone that shows what hydrogen fuel cells can enable in real subsea operations,” said William Smith, President & CEO of Infinity Fuel Cell and Hydrogen, Inc. “This result highlights the role fuel cell technology can play in extending endurance, reducing intervention requirements, and supporting more capable long-range autonomous missions.”

While on mission, Envoy’s hydrogen fuel cell system generated water as a by-product, underscoring the lower-emission potential of fuel cell-powered subsea operations alongside their endurance benefits. The demonstration reinforces Envoy’s suitability for missions where endurance directly affects mission continuity, offshore efficiency, and the practicality of sustained subsea deployment.

Noah Note: A significant achievement for Cellula. The company has been positioning to offer Hydrogen-cell options for it's line of AUV. I should note that Envoy is not the same as Guardian, the XLUUV that we often speak about here. However, this is a step in the direction of certifying Hydrogen-cells for the Guardian.

Envoy is the smaller sister of Guardian, woth a proposed range of 2000km, so not only resching that but exceeding it is a fantastic achievement, and a testament to the companies efforts to develop a donestic, long-range AUV capability for Canada.

Again, while the Guardian is the primary course of discussion thanks to the ongoing Uncrewed Underwater Surveillance System project, smaller AUV like Envoy will likely remain the primary workhorse of the future UUV fleet.

At 8.5m, 2700 kgs, and with a fifteen day endurance, a platform like Envoy provides the navy with a highly transportable, Long-Endurance, Autonomous platform that could rapidly be deployed from almost anynplanned platform, including potentially smaller platforms like FASST-V, dependent of course on final size and layout.

Envoy can assist in a number of roles including as an ISR platform, MCM, Monitoring and Survelliance of Critical Undersea Infrastructure, Surveying, and as a platform for deploying other payloads, such as deployable sensors, relays, or smaller ROV for supporting Undersea Infrastructure.

Guardian will be the independent, long-range platform that will be deployed to monitor the channels of the Archipelago and up in the Arctic, at least in theory. Platforms like Envoy will be the sort of AUV you will commonly see deployed in support of platforms like the River-class, CDC, and AOPS.

So it's always nice to see these kinds of platforms, especially Canadian ones, making the strides to become proper platforms worth considering in the conversation.

He was meeting with Susan Holt, Premier of New Brunswick. The SOS released the following photo and statement:

“Continuing to increase Canada's defence spending to reach our 5% NATO commitment by 2035 will require close collaboration between the federal government and the provinces.

Today, I met with the Premier of New Brunswick, Susan Holt to discuss how we can work together to grow the province's role in Canada's defence sector.

New Brunswick has shown real potential in this space. By aligning federal investments with provincial priorities, we can unlock new opportunities for local industry, strengthen supply chains, and create good-paying jobs for Canadians.

This is what effective collaboration looks like. Federal and provincial governments working together to deliver for Canadians.”